ShareThis Page
Western Pennsylvania Fugitive Task Force fatally shoots man in Knoxville |

Western Pennsylvania Fugitive Task Force fatally shoots man in Knoxville

The Tribune-Review
| Tuesday, January 6, 2015 11:26 a.m
Philip G. Pavely | Trib Total Media
Pittsburgh police inspect the scene of a fatal shooting by U.S. Marshals fugitive task force on Tuesday, Jan. 6, 2015, in Knoxville.
Police shot and killed Leslie Sapp, 47, shortly after 7 a.m. Tuesday, Jan. 6, 2015. According to court documents and a marshals alert, Sapp was wanted for allegedly raping a 12-year-old girl.

Leslie Sapp was hiding from charges of raping a little girl for three years when he jumped out in front of the men who’d come to Knoxville to arrest him Tuesday morning. He assumed a firing stance and pointed what appeared to be a gun at them, officials said.

Members of the U.S. Marshals Western Pennsylvania Fugitive Task Force fatally shot Sapp, 47.

Sapp’s weapon, they later learned, was an air pellet gun.

Pittsburgh police, who were not involved in the shooting, are investigating.

“The officers fired to defend themselves. That’s really as much as I can share at this time,” Pittsburgh police Chief Cameron McLay said at a news conference.

Sapp died of gunshots in the torso, the Allegheny County Medical Examiner’s Office said.

U.S. Marshal Steven Frank said this is the first shooting and the first fatality since he became the marshal for Western Pennsylvania three years ago. His staff only recalls one other shooting by the task force, a fatality in Johnstown in 2000.

Frank declined to comment further, saying his office’s policy is to allow the Pittsburgh police to conduct the investigation into the shooting.

“We want to let the process work,” he said.

Members of the fugitive task force — including a Pennsylvania State Police trooper and an Allegheny County Sheriff’s deputy — arrived at Sapp’s home on Redlyn Street shortly after 7 a.m. to serve an arrest warrant, officials said.

According to court documents and a marshals alert, Sapp was wanted for repeatedly raping a girl during a three-year period since before she was 10 years old.

State court records indicate Sapp, who was originally from Philadelphia, had a long criminal history, most recently pleading guilty to a felony firearms charge in October 2013, for which he was sentenced to three years’ probation.

Officials said members of the task force went into the house and ordered Sapp, who was at the top of the stairs, to show his hands, but he instead jumped out with what looked like a gun, took a shooting stance and pointed it at them, officials said.

At least two, and possibly three officers, fired at Sapp, officials said.

It is not clear whether Sapp fired his air gun at the officers. McLay declined to say whether the law enforcement officers who shot Sapp would be placed on leave while his department investigates the shooting.

Authorities issued the arrest warrant for Sapp in July on charges of rape, aggravated indecent assault, indecent assault, statutory sexual assault, endangering the welfare of a child and corruption of a minor.

The girl told police that Sapp, a friend of her family, molested her at least five times between April 2011 and March 2014. The assaults usually occurred in her aunt’s home, as well as in a car and in the home on Redlyn Street, according to the criminal complaint.

The girl told police she was reluctant to report the assaults because she was afraid of Sapp and didn’t want to get into trouble with her mother.

Sapp had been in and out of state prison since he was in his early 20s, a Department of Corrections spokeswoman said.

Sue Bensinger said he had been incarcerated on and off since 1990 on parole violations and charges of receiving stolen property and robbery. She said the last time the state prison system had anything to do with Sapp was when he was paroled in 2008.

Margaret Harding and Tony Raap are staff writers for Trib Total Media.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.