ShareThis Page
Westmoreland Tuesday takes |

Westmoreland Tuesday takes

| Tuesday, May 3, 2005 12:00 a.m

Partisan politics: Why the flap over Republican Bob Davidson’s decision to seek a full term as a Hempfield Township supervisor• Davidson originally said he would not run after he was appointed in December to fill Bob Regola’s unexpired term. Mr. Davidson has since changed his mind in light of important land-use issues in the township. Is that so troublesome for some to understand• Or is this about Davidson’s party affiliation• The decision is his; let the voters decide the outcome.

Kids and suds: Some may take issue with Hempfield’s decision allowing the Chuck E. Cheese pizza chain to transfer a liquor license for a new restaurant that will be situated at the Westmoreland Mall. After all, the business caters primarily to children, right• But on what grounds could supervisors legally reject the request if the business meets the requirements for a license• Rather than abuse their authority, supervisors upheld the law.

Pay & performance: Forbes magazine says Mellon Financial Corp. Chairman Martin G. McGuinn is this year’s fourth worst-performing boss among the nation’s 500 largest companies. Mr. McGuinn has been paid an average of $5.5 million a year over the past six years; Mellon’s annualized return for the same period has been a negative 2 percent, Forbes calculates. That’s a lot of money for such little “performance.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.