ShareThis Page
Westmoreland Tuesday takes |

Westmoreland Tuesday takes

| Tuesday, December 5, 2006 12:00 a.m

No ka- ching : Residents hoping to play the slots will need to travel farther to do so now that both Nemacolin Woodlands Resort and Seven Springs Mountain Resort are not pursuing gaming licenses. Some sticky stipulations and questionable investment returns scotched the deals. But local tourism officials aren’t terribly concerned. That’s because it’s tough to estimate the net “loss” when any increase in economic activity was never adequately quantified in the first place.

Wishful thinking: Responding to balancing Unity Township’s 2007 budget without a tax increase, Supervisor Mike O’Barto says if municipal officials remain fiscally diligent, “I can’t see raising taxes here in my lifetime.” But for Unity and other large municipalities, some unpleasant issues loom: the future of volunteer firefighting as more older volunteers drop out and the prospect of paying for state police services. It’s not going to be all roses ahead, by any imaginative stretch.

College cooperation: Officials of Westmoreland County Community College and California University of Pennsylvania have announced a new agreement that will allow WCCC students to transfer to California after they earn their associate in arts degrees and meet admission requirements. That will save students both time and money, officials say. And that may make all the difference for some to continue their education.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.