ShareThis Page
Westmoreland will save on moving voting machines |

Westmoreland will save on moving voting machines

David Hunt
| Wednesday, April 26, 2006 12:00 a.m

Westmoreland County election officials expect to save more than $20,000 in voting machine transport costs in the May primary election.

Election Director Paula T. Pedicone said the moving company will be carrying a much lighter load to the county’s 306 polling places May 16. The county’s 240,000 registered voters will be casting ballots for the first time on the iVotronic touch-screen voting machine, a model replacing the bulky levered machines that had been used for almost half a century.

Even in their protective moving cases, Pedicone said, the iVotronics weigh much less than their predecessors.

“There’s a big difference between a 65-pound unit and one that weighs 800 pounds,” she said.

The county is purchasing 800 iVotronics from Nebraska-based Election Systems and Software Inc. for $2.5 million, a cost that will be covered by $2.9 million in federal money held in escrow by the Pennsylvania Department of State. By the primary, 740 of the machines are scheduled to be in place, with the remaining 60 to arrive by the November general election.

County officials say they were required to switch to an electronic voting system this year under the Help America Vote Act, a four-year-old federal law passed in response to counting problems that plagued the 2000 presidential election in Florida.

Ryan Moving and Storage Inc., of Pittsburgh, submitted the lone bid for the May 16 transport. The county commissioners are expected to approve the $11,990 contract this week.

In November, Vesely Brothers Moving and Storage Inc., of Belle Vernon, was granted a $32,500 contract to move the levered machines.

Westmoreland’s levered machines remain at a county warehouse for now, but Pedicone said they’re destined for the scrap yard.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.