ShareThis Page
Abuse lasted decade, Alle-Kiski girl claims |

Abuse lasted decade, Alle-Kiski girl claims

| Tuesday, August 5, 2014 11:12 p.m

An Alle-Kiski girl testified on Tuesday that she was repeatedly assaulted during a 10-year period starting when she was 5.

Shawn Alan Bracken, 36, of Vandergrift is on trial in Westmoreland County Court for allegedly assaulting the girl in homes in Vandergrift and Allegheny Township, according to township and Vandergrift police.

Charges were filed in December 2011.

In more than 90 minutes of testimony, the alleged victim said the assaults came to light because Bracken secretly took nude photos of her while she was getting out of a shower.

The girl, who remained calm throughout her testimony, said the photo incident occurred when she was 15, and it followed a series of sexual assaults from the time she was 5 until she was 14.

The assaults stopped for a time, the girl said, but resumed and culminated with the photo incident.

The alleged victim told her stepmother that Bracken took her photo, and her stepmother contacted police.

The girl is expected to resume testimony when the trial continues on Wednesday morning before Judge Chris Feliciani.

Chuck Brittain is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at

Categories: Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.