ShareThis Page
Attorney questions mental capacity of Laurel Mountain man accused of killing girlfriend |

Attorney questions mental capacity of Laurel Mountain man accused of killing girlfriend

Rich Cholodofsky
| Thursday, August 25, 2016 11:00 p.m
Sean Stipp | Tribune-Review
Holding a Bible, Gregory R. Randall of Laurel Mountain is led into the office of Magisterial District Judge James Falcon on May 13, 2014. Randall is accused of slaying Angela Cavalero, 52, his roommate for the last year.

The long-delayed trial of a Laurel Mountain man accused of bludgeoning his girlfriend to death in 2014 will be put off a little longer as his attorney explores a mental infirmity defense.

Defense attorney Brian Aston in Westmoreland County Court on Thursday said his client, Gregory Randall, had suffered a traumatic brain injury in an automobile crash that could have left him unable to form a specific intent to commit murder.

Randall, 60, is charged with first-degree murder in the death of 52-year-old Angela Marie Cavalero. He is accused of beating her 29 times in the head and face with a hammer and a wine bottle during a domestic dispute. Her body was found six days after the beating, police said.

Aston wants Randall to be evaluated by a neuropsychologist to determine the extent of his mental ability at the time of the killing.

“I have a question if that injury impacted his cognitive abilities and that goes to the degree of guilt,” Aston said.

Randall would face a mandatory life sentence if he is convicted of first-degree murder. He could be eligible for parole if he is convicted of a lesser offense such as third-degree murder or manslaughter.

Judge Richard E. McCormick ordered Aston to finalize efforts to have Randall examined within the next month.

The prosecution has said that Randall and Cavalero lived together for more than a year before the slaying.

During testimony at a preliminary hearing last year, an inmate at Westmoreland County Prison testified that Randall said he attacked his live-in girlfriend after she hit him in the face with a frozen TV dinner.

The first-degree murder case against Randall was initially dismissed following a preliminary hearing before District Judge Michael Mahady, who ruled the prosecution’s evidence was speculative and could not be sustained at trial.

Westmoreland County District Attorney John Peck refiled the case with another district judge, who, after a second preliminary hearing, allowed the case to move forward.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-830-6293 or

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, or via Twitter .

Categories: Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.