Bedford County widow sues Excela Latrobe for husband’s 2016 death |

Bedford County widow sues Excela Latrobe for husband’s 2016 death


A Bedford County woman on Friday sued Excela Health Latrobe hospital for the 2016 death of her husband.

The wrongful death lawsuit claims Larry G. Cooper, of Schellsburg, died hours after being improperly diagnosed and treated during a brief visit to the health center. Cooper died at Latrobe Regional Health and Rehabilitation Center, a facility for older people with chronic health conditions or injuries that require long-term care.

The four-count lawsuit — filed in Westmoreland County by his wife, Ruby G. Cooper — claims medical staff at the Latrobe hospital did not take a proper medical history and failed to conduct an appropriate physical exam during a trip to the emergency room on Nov. 5, 2016.

According to the lawsuit, Larry Cooper was not prescribed the proper pain-relieving medication and was discharged after few hours and returned to the rehab center. He died hours later, according to the lawsuit.

Cooper, according to the lawsuit, came to the hospital with a clogged a nasogastric tube and leg pain.

Officials with Excela Health could not be reached for comment. Also named as defendants in the lawsuit are Dr. David G. Weinberg and Westmoreland Emergency Medical Specialists.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.