Cops: Jeannette man accused of rape, threats |

Cops: Jeannette man accused of rape, threats


A 46-year-old Jeannette man on Monday remained in the Westmoreland County Prison on accusations that he raped a woman over the weekend and held her against her will.

Richard C. Bankosh Jr. was arraigned before District Judge Joseph DeMarchis on charges of rape, sexual assault, aggravated indecent assault, terroristic threats and false imprisonment filed by city police. DeMarchis ordered Bankosh held in the county jail after he failed to post $250,000 bail.

The female told police that she was raped by Bankosh and a second man, who has not been charged, inside a residence in the 1300 block of Penn Avenue.

Patrolman Bryan DeFelice reported in court papers that he was called to a residence on South 12th Street around 5 p.m. Sunday, where a woman inside the residence was “crying and shaking” and directed him to a van parked outside that was being driven by Bankosh.

According to DeFelice, the woman said Bankosh wouldn’t let her leave after the alleged assaults. She agreed to accompany him as he “was driving around looking for booze and the (alleged) victim suggested stopping at a relative’s home,” where police were summoned.

“The (alleged) victim stated that she was afraid to get away because (Bankosh) stated he would kill her … and she was now his girlfriend,” DeFelice reported.

A preliminary hearing is scheduled Oct. 4 before DeMarchis.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer.
You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or
via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.