Cops: Jeannette man took ATV off road 3 times to avoid questioning |

Cops: Jeannette man took ATV off road 3 times to avoid questioning


A Jeannette man who allegedly foiled three attempts by city police to question him July 22 following an area burglary by fleeing on an all-terrain vehicle was charged Monday with numerous criminal and traffic offenses.

Richard L. Berger, 50, is charged with fleeing and eluding, flight to avoid apprehension, reckless endangerment, resisting arrest, careless driving, defiant trespass, unlawfully driving along a railroad right-of-way, and illegal operation of an all-terrain vehicle in connection with the incident. Berger is not charged with burglary.

Patrolman Thomas Yaniszeski reported in court documents that Berger was identified through photographs and a subsequent investigation.

Yaniszeski reported that he was walking near the Norfolk Southern Railroad tracks near 14th Street while investigating a nearby burglary about 6:43 p.m. July 22 when a blue ATV with a passenger aboard slammed on its brakes to avoid striking him. The officer reported that the ATV nearly struck his patrol car as it fled.

Police allege that Berger and his female passenger fled off the railroad tracks on to South 14th Street and escaped by driving โ€œoff road through several yards.โ€

A short time later, Yaniszeski said he again located the ATV and its driver, who did not wear a helmet, in a wooded area near 15th Street in the woods, but the man โ€” who was then alone โ€” refused orders to stay where he was and drove off.

Police later located the driver and vehicle near Vale Street but reported he escaped a third time by driving the ATV through a creek.

A preliminary hearing has not been scheduled.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.