Cops: Jeannette man who falsely pulled fire alarm resisted arrest |

Cops: Jeannette man who falsely pulled fire alarm resisted arrest


Jeannette Police allege a city man who pulled a fire alarm at a sports bar late Monday scuffled with police and was illegally in possession of Oxycodone pills.

Brian K. DeFelice, 51, is charged with making false alarms, disorderly conduct, resisting arrest, possession of a controlled substance and public drunkenness after the incident at 10:45 p.m. Monday at Franko’s Sports Bar and Grill on Baughman Avenue.

Patrolman Derek Manley alleges that fire department officials asked police to investigate the false alarm after units responded to the scene.

A witness told police that he saw DeFelice pull the alarm as he stepped outside to smoke a cigarette. Manley reported that when questioned, DeFelice denied the allegation.

When DeFelice was taken into custody, Manley reported in court documents that he began to resist “for an unknown reason.” During a search, police confiscated suspected Oxycodone pills in DeFelice’s pocket.

DeFelice’s preliminary hearing is scheduled Oct. 25 before District Judge Joseph DeMarchis.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.