ShareThis Page
Dad accused of selling heroin in Greensburg maternity ward seeks admission to drug court |

Dad accused of selling heroin in Greensburg maternity ward seeks admission to drug court

Paul Peirce
| Thursday, February 22, 2018 12:06 p.m
Paul Pierce | Tribune-Review
Cody R. Hulse, 25, of Latrobe, is accused of selling heroin in the maternity ward at Excela Health Westmoreland Hospital.

A Latrobe man accused of selling heroin in the Excela Health Westmoreland hospital maternity ward room where others were visiting his newborn daughter on Oct. 19 wants to be admitted to the county’s intensive drug treatment court program.

Cody Hulse, 25, appeared Thursday before Greensburg District Judge Chris Flanigan with his attorney, Randall Ricciuti of Pittsburgh, to formally sign paperwork waiving his right to a preliminary hearing.

Assistant District Attorney Peter Caravello stressed that there is no plea agreement.

“It’s just a general hearing waiver. There is no plea agreement in place,” he said.

Ricciuti corroborated Caravello’s explanation.

“We’re making application for Cody to be admitted into the county’s drug court program. Court is supposed to be about rehabilitation, and this drug court program has a proven record of successful treatment. And we believe he is certainly a well-qualified candidate,” Ricciuti said.

Hulse is charged with manufacturing and delivery of a controlled substance, possession of heroin, possession of drug paraphernalia and endangering the welfare of children.

He was arrested by Greensburg police after city Detective John Swank stopped a vehicle on North Main Street in Greensburg and found heroin and paraphernalia. The occupants told Swank they had just bought the drugs from Hulse at the Greensburg hospital where Hulse’s girlfriend had given birth earlier in the day.

Officers went to the maternity room and confronted Hulse, who admitted selling the drugs and had heroin in his pocket, Swank reported in an affidavit of probable cause. Police confiscated 34 stamp bags of suspected heroin marked “Final Call” along with a hypodermic needle and two caps.

Police say Hulse’s girlfriend, the baby’s mother, told them she didn’t know about the drug deals.

“Cody is not a bad guy. … He’s young and deserves another chance. We should look at rehabilitating and helping him …. not just letting him sit and rot in jail,” Ricciuti said.

Through 2017, 14 participants have completed the county treatment court’s strict requirements.

The special court was initiated in 2015 as county officials struggled with a surging drug epidemic that has flooded courtrooms with cases and prisons with addicted inmates. In exchange for their participation, the defendants can get mitigated sentences.

However, they first must go through a rigorous process that includes months of close supervision by probation officials and one of two judges, as well as attending regular therapy sessions, undergoing drug tests and keeping a diary.

Ricciuti hopes to hear whether Hulse is accepted into the program before his formal common pleas court arraignment April 18 before Judge Christopher A. Feliciani.

Hulse remains in the county prison on $100,000 bond where he has been held since his arrest.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2860, or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, or via Twitter .

Categories: Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.