Archive

ShareThis Page
Diocese gets preliminary injunction against mandate | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Diocese gets preliminary injunction against mandate

Tribune-Review
| Saturday, June 21, 2014 12:01 a.m
gtrbosco0704131
Brian F. Henry | Tribune-Review
Bishop Lawrence Brandt of the Diocese of Greensburg addresses the media about the death of former Bishop Emeritus Anthony Bosco at the Greensburg Pastoral Center on Wednesday, July 3, 2013.

A preliminary injunction was granted Friday by a federal judge that temporarily halts the enforcement of the Affordable Care Act on the Catholic Diocese of Greensburg and two diocesan affiliates.

A hearing set for next month will determine whether a permanent injunction is warranted to prevent the Department of Health and Human Services from imposing fines related to the act.

“Our objective is to secure a permanent injunction to stop enforcement of the mandate,” Bishop Lawrence E. Brandt said in a written statement.

The diocese, Catholic Charities in Greensburg and St. John the Evangelist Regional Catholic School in Uniontown sued the department in U.S. District Court in Pittsburgh on May 27, claiming that requirements for health insurance covering abortion-inducing drugs, sterilization, contraceptives and related counseling infringes on their religious beliefs.

U.S. District Judge Arthur Schwab’s decision to grant the motion was expedited to meet an impending insurance plan renewal deadline for the diocese at the end of June.

Complying with the Affordable Care Act would “cause (the plaintiffs) to violate their sincerely held religious beliefs; or, their conscience disregard of (it) will cause them to potentially incur large monetary fines and/or other penalties,” Schwab wrote in an opinion.

Brandt said in his written statement that fines associated with noncompliance “would seriously jeopardize how our Catholic schools and Catholic Charities conduct their ministries and would jeopardize, in fact, their very existence.”

The diocese serves as trustee for 78 parishes and their charitable trusts in Armstrong, Fayette, Indiana and Westmoreland counties, which have a Catholic population of about 153,000. About 600 employees of the diocese and its affiliated entities are eligible for coverage through its Catholic Benefits Trust, according to the lawsuit. About 400 employees use the insurance, and about 800 individuals, including dependents, are covered.

A Justice Department attorney has asked that the diocese’s request be dismissed because the church can offer a “self-insured church plan” to employees that would allow the diocese to opt out of paying for services against their religious beliefs.

The Catholic Diocese of Greensburg is the third diocese in Western Pennsylvania to file suit against the federal government to claim that the Affordable Care Act infringes upon the religious beliefs of the Roman Catholic Church.

Identical lawsuits were filed last year by the Pittsburgh and Erie dioceses and affiliates. In November, they won a court injunction exempting the affiliates from the mandates.

An appeal is pending.

Renatta Signorini is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-837-5374 orrsignorini@tribweb.com.

is a former freelancer.

Categories: Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.