ShareThis Page
Donegal Lake lifts fishing limits ahead of draining, dam reconstruction |

Donegal Lake lifts fishing limits ahead of draining, dam reconstruction

Paul Peirce
| Thursday, September 22, 2016 10:45 p.m
Barry Reeger | Tribune-Review
A boat navigates Donegal Lake on Wednesday, Aug. 17, 2016 in Donegal. Gov. Tom Wolf has released $25.7 million in funding for the repair of five high-hazard, unsafe dams, including Donegal Lake and Somerset Lake.

Shawn Snyder of Donegal and his 17-year-old son, Matthew, thought they would take advantage of summer-like temperatures to fish in Donegal Lake before sunset Thursday, but they weren’t very lucky.

“The fish were jumping, though. I missed one, but my son did catch a largemouth (bass),” the elder Snyder said.

The Snyders also took advantage of the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission’s lifting of size and creel limit regulations at the 90-acre lake in Donegal Township to prepare for a $6.5 million dam replacement project.

“We don’t fish here too often, but it will be sad for people who fish it a lot when they drain it,” Snyder said.

“But in the end when the dam is rebuilt, it will be better,” he said.

Officials with the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission conducted a meeting Thursday night to review its plans for the project.

Michele Jacoby, director of the bureau of engineering for the commission, said the drawdown of the lake will begin next week.

“It’s been very apparent there are structural deficiencies of that earthen dam. The concrete on the spillway has just aged, and it’s just worn,” she said.

“Since we’ve lifted the size and creel limits, we’re encouraging people to get out there and fish,” she added.

She anticipates the lake will be completely drained by late October. The project will be bid in the spring, and the commission anticipates construction to begin in late summer or fall of 2017. The lake likely won’t be refilled until the fall of 2018, and trout restocking won’t take place until spring 2019.

Township Supervisor Tom Stull said area residents will certainly miss the lake, which attracts about $1 million in tourism dollars annually, but the work is needed. He said there was even talk that the dam was in such poor condition the state was considering “draining it and letting it just sit until funding was found.”

“This project is a good thing, I think,” he said.

But for Diana and George Masella of nearby Acme, they’ll miss fishing practically every day and going out on a boat to enjoy picnic lunches.

“It’s only 10 minutes from our home. We’ve been fishing it for 30 years,” George Masella said.

Diana Masella said she couldn’t understand why the project will take so long to complete.

Last month, Gov. Tom Wolf announced the release of $25.7 million in capital budget funding for the repair of five high-hazard, unsafe dams, including Donegal Lake, and the design of two other dams.

Dams are considered unsafe if they have a deficiency that, if not corrected, could cause substantial property damage and a probable loss of human life upon the dam’s failure, said the commission’s Tim Schaeffer.

Commission officials said a salvage operation will be conducted, likely in late October, to move as many fish as possible to another body of water.

In advance of the fish salvage, the commission has temporarily lifted all seasons, sizes and creel limits at the lake. The lake is primarily stocked with trout, but also holds largemouth bass, white and black crappie, and bluegill.

“We want fishermen to fish the water and make good use of as many fish as they can,” Jacoby said.

The earthen dam was constructed in 1967 and its expected life was 50 years, she said.

About 20 area residents attending the meeting.

Paul Peirce is a reporter for the Tribune-Review. He can be reached at 724-850-2860 or

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, or via Twitter .

Categories: Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.