ShareThis Page
Ex-carnival worker convicted of molesting boys drops bid to skip sex-offender registration |

Ex-carnival worker convicted of molesting boys drops bid to skip sex-offender registration

Matthew Santoni
| Tuesday, May 29, 2018 3:09 p.m

An elderly ex-carnival worker has withdrawn his request to be exempted from sex-offender registration requirements if he is released from prison.

Joseph Busija, 87, formerly of Penn Township, had written to Westmoreland County Common Pleas Judge Timothy Krieger last month, arguing that his 1997 conviction for molesting two children from Florida and Jeannette predated the state’s registration requirement for sex offenders, so he shouldn’t have to register when and if he is paroled from his 15- to 30-year prison sentence.

Authorities and witnesses at his trial said Busija met the two victims at carnivals where he worked, and they ended up in his custody before he began molesting them. One victim, from Florida, lived with Busija nearly nine years until they tried to cross the Canadian border with a pet pig; the victim escaped when border agents denied the pig entry, and the boy was sent back to Penn Township with it.

Prosecutors answered in a brief that while parts of the law requiring registration at the time of his conviction were declared unconstitutional in 1999, the registration requirement more generally has been upheld and reinforced by more recent laws.

Busija was scheduled for a hearing Tuesday morning but wrote another letter to Krieger asking to withdraw the motion. He was not present in court, having previously waived being transported from the State Correctional Institute at Laurel Highlands.

Matthew Santoni is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724 836 6660, or via Twitter @msantoni.

Categories: Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.