Ex-youth group volunteer from Monroeville indicted on child pornography charges |

Ex-youth group volunteer from Monroeville indicted on child pornography charges

A Monroeville man and former church youth volunteer was indicted by a federal grand jury Tuesday on child pornography charges.

Andrew Mark Patterson, 45, is facing three counts related to his alleged distribution, receipt and possession of child pornography videos and images, according to U.S. Attorney David Hickton.

Patterson was arrested Oct. 16 by an Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office detective. He had the largest collection of child pornography in recent memory, according to an office spokesman.

The indictment alleges that between June 15 and 16, Patterson distributed videos and images of child pornography, according to a news release. On Sept. 8, he allegedly received inappropriate videos. On the day of his arrest, he possessed videos and images of child pornography, authorities said.

Patterson was a volunteer with a youth group at Living Waters Family Worship Center in North Huntingdon.

He could receive a maximum sentence of 50 years in prison.

He is being held in the Allegheny County Jail on $50,000 bail. He also is charged with child endangerment.

Monroeville police allege that officers found “deplorable conditions” inside Patterson’s home, where he lived with his wife, Tina Marie, 41, and their daughter.

Feces from 10 Pomeranian dogs, dog food and garbage were strewn throughout the house, police said. Tina Patterson also is charged with endangerment.

Both formal arraignments on the endangerment charge are set for Dec. 16 in Allegheny County court.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.