Former Excela doctor admits to writing himself bogus painkiller prescriptions |

Former Excela doctor admits to writing himself bogus painkiller prescriptions

Dan Speicher | Tribune-Review
Dr. Ralph Capone, of Greensburg, makes his way into District Judge Mark Mansour’s office, on Wednesday, Oct. 11, 2017.

A Hempfield doctor pleaded guilty Tuesday to charges that he illegally wrote drug prescriptions for his personal use.

Dr. Ralph Capone, 65, the former chief medical officer at Excela Health Westmoreland Hospital, was charged last year with 23 counts following a state investigation that started with an anonymous tip to the federally monitored 411 drug tip line.

Investigators said Capone from 2014 through his arrest last October wrote more than 300 prescriptions for hydrocodone and other pain killers using the names of family members, including his children, wife and mother, to receive the medication for his personal use. The fraudulent prescriptions were supplied to pharmacies in Greensburg, Hempfield and Jeannette, authorities said.

In court on Tuesday, Capone pleaded guilty to four consolidated counts, including three drug offenses and identity theft. He will be sentenced Oct. 25 by Westmoreland County Common Pleas Judge Meagan Bilik-DeFazio.

“These kinds of illegal diversions of prescription drugs are fueling the opioid epidemic in Pennsylvania. We will continue to prosecute anyone who illegally abuses prescription drugs, including doctors and other health care professions,” Attorney General Josh Shapiro said in a statement issued Tuesday.

Capone is free on bail pending his sentencing. He most recently operated a private medical practice in North Huntingdon.

He served as chief medical officer at Excela Health from 2007 to 2009. Before that, he was medical director of the now-defunct Jeannette District Memorial Hospital from 1996 to 2003.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293 or [email protected]

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.