Former Westmoreland County HR director says commissioners’ feud led to firing |

Former Westmoreland County HR director says commissioners’ feud led to firing

Gina Cerilli

Westmoreland County’s former human resources director alleges in a federal lawsuit that a political feud between Democratic commissioners Gina Cerilli and Ted Kopas led to his firing.

James A. Burgess filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Pittsburgh, claiming he was unlawfully fired by Cerilli. In addition to Cerilli, Burgess names as defendants his former employer, Felice Associates of Greensburg, and the firm’s owner, John Felice.

In the 10-page lawsuit filed Friday, Burgess alleges he was told by Felice he was fired “as a direct result of the plaintiff’s perceived support for, and affiliation with, Commissioner Ted Kopas.”

Burgess also claimed in the lawsuit that the Felice contract with the county was terminated because he continued to investigate the county sheriff’s office and because Cerilli was angered that he did not support her political initiatives.

The lawsuit also states Burgess ran into the ire of Cerilli when filling numerous county employment positions.

At the time of his firing, Burgess was investigating the sheriff’s office warrant fee process at the request of Kopas, according to the lawsuit. Burgess alleges that Felice asked him to stop looking into that matter involving Sheriff Jonathan Held’s office because Felice and Held are friends.

Cerilli said she could not comment on pending litigation.

Kopas said he had not seen the lawsuit and could not comment. He denied being at odds with Cerilli.

“I’m not aware of any rivalry between us. I will say that this (lawsuit) is just another strike against the Felice outsourcing contract that I have never agreed to validate,” Kopas said.

Felice Associates was hired in 2014 to provide human resource management for the county.

In March, Cerilli and Commissioner Charles Anderson voted to hire Felice Associates for $84,000 to oversee negotiations with county unions, oversee labor relations and support the new human resource staff.

Kopas voted against hiring Felice Associates in 2014 and again under a revised contract in March.

Felice said Monday he had not seen a copy of the complaint and could not comment.

Burgess contends in the lawsuit that Cerilli reprimanded him for “overstepping his authority” during a search this year for a county financial director. In the lawsuit, he said Cerilli was against rehiring Meghan McCandless to the post that pays $69,542 annually and which Kopas and Anderson supported.

Burgess says he was targeted for retaliation in violation of his constitutional rights. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.