ShareThis Page
GOP gubernatorial candidate Scott Wagner holds Greensburg town hall |

GOP gubernatorial candidate Scott Wagner holds Greensburg town hall

Wesley Venteicher
| Wednesday, July 11, 2018 9:39 p.m
Wes Venteicher | Tribune-Review
Republican gubernatorial candidate Scott Wagner told a town hall audience that his business background would help him balance spending and reduce waste in state government, on Wednesday, July 11, 2018, at the Garden and Civic Center Auditorium in Greensburg.

Republican gubernatorial candidate Scott Wagner took questions from a mostly-friendly crowd in Greensburg on Wednesday night, reaffirming his positions on bread-and-butter issues ranging from cutting regulations to reforming pensions.

His town hall at the Garden and Civic Center Auditorium was the fourth of six stops on the first tour of Wagner’s general election campaign.

He railed against Gov. Tom Wolf’s leadership, saying he would bring his background as a businessman to state government, balancing spending and reducing waste.

The most asked-about topic was natural gas. Asked what can be done to expand natural gas development and jobs, Wagner said the state and the region need more pipelines, more cracker plants like the one under development in Beaver County and to grow the industry of manufacturing plastic from natural gas products.

He said the state needs a governor who is more willing to sit down with energy companies and clear the way for development.

“We don’t need any more hearings,” he said. “I’m tired of hearings and task forces.”

Asked about fracking near schools in places like Fox Chapel and Mars and potential health impacts to teachers and children, he said he hadn’t yet received questions specifically about the development near schools and would research the issue.

“We want to make sure that everyone is safe; that everyone is compliant,” he said.

He blamed state Department of Environmental Protection regulations for sewer and water rate increases, repeating a favorite phrase, “The people of Pennsylvania are being nickel-and-dimed to death,” and pledging to do something about it.

Paul Verostko, 58, of Scottsdale asked Wagner whether he would eliminate school property taxes. Wagner promised he would, adding that he has ideas to bring in $2 billion to $4 billion in new revenue without specifying where that money would come from.

Wagner touched on Pennsylvania’s high gas tax but said that as a business owner he doesn’t mind paying the tax if the roads are in good shape — but they’re not, he said. He blamed ice-melt for an increase in potholes, saying the state should reduce the brine getting into cracks in the road.

“You don’t need 75 engineers at PennDOT to make that decision; hell, a garbage man can make that decision,” he said, referring to the trash-hauling business he founded and made millions of dollars in in York.

He kicked off the event with a pre-emptive deflection of any questions related to climate change, saying, “Are we electing a governor or are we hiring a scientist?”

In response to a question on the death penalty, Wagner promised to reverse Wolf’s moratorium on executions within 48 hours of becoming governor and signing death warrants for criminals who he said deserve the penalty.

Wagner left his state Senate seat five weeks ago to campaign full time. He said he has been doing four to eight campaign events a day.

Wesley Venteicher is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Wesley at 412-380-5676, or via Twitter @wesventeicher.

Wes Venteicher is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Wes at 412-380-5676, or via Twitter .

Categories: Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.