ShareThis Page
Greater Latrobe school board eyeing tax hike |

Greater Latrobe school board eyeing tax hike

Jeff Himler
| Tuesday, May 8, 2018 9:36 p.m
Tomislav Forgo

Greater Latrobe School District administrators say a half-mill property tax increase may be needed to bridge an expected $170,000 shortfall in finances for the 2018-19 school year.

The school board Tuesday reviewed a proposed $56 million budget for the coming school year that includes a $630,521 increase in expenditures, but only a $460,521 increase in revenues.

District business administrator Dan Watson said special education costs accounted for the largest single increase — $463,803, or 21.5 percent. Much of that hike was attributed to serving several students with high levels of special needs.

Medical expenses went down by 7 percent, costs for business operations decreased by about 4 percent.

Board member Mike O’Barto, who has steadfastly opposed tax hikes and proposed a tax break for senior citizens, asked if district officials could manage to balance the budget while holding the property tax at its current 80.75 mills.

If the board sets that goal, Watson said, “I will work with our administrative team and we’ll come back with a recommendation.”

A half-mill hike would add about $13 to the average property owner’s tax bill.

The board is also considering a 5-cent increase in school meal prices. They are expected to vote on a tentative budget at the board’s May 15 meeting.

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-836-6622, or via Twitter @jhimler_news.

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Jeff by email at or via Twitter .

Categories: Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.