ShareThis Page
Greensburg cop accused of falsifying commercial truck inspections |

Greensburg cop accused of falsifying commercial truck inspections

Renatta Signorini
| Friday, March 18, 2016 11:00 p.m

A Greensburg police officer was charged Friday with falsifying six commercial truck inspections.

Robert James Shapiro II, 43, of Latrobe claimed to have completed full checks on the trucks, but dash camera video showed otherwise, according to an affidavit of probable cause.

After information about the discrepancies was brought to the attention of the city police department by state police in February, an internal investigation was done, according to police Chief Chad Zucco. Shapiro, a patrolman, was terminated March 1, he said.

Shapiro is charged with two counts of tampering with public records or information and a single charge of obstructing administration of law or other governmental function.

Last month, Zucco provided to county Detective Randall Gardner copies of six full inspection reports that Shapiro allegedly completed, along with the corresponding patrol car videos. The reports were dated between Oct. 26 and Dec. 8, police said.

Zucco said Friday that a few city officers are certified to do inspections of commercial trucks as they travel through Greensburg.

State police have troopers trained to conduct similar inspections, and Gardner enlisted the help of one to review the reports and videos, according to the affidavit.

Trooper John Sherid concluded that Shapiro had not conducted full inspections, police said.

The investigation was initiated after a truck driver complained to state police that Shapiro claimed to have completed a full inspection but didn’t. Dash camera video corroborated the complaint, police said.

State police suspended Shapiro’s certification when they found other “irregularities,” Gardner wrote in the complaint.

The allegedly erroneous reports could impact a trucking company’s safety ratings and insurance rates, as well as allow potentially unsafe vehicles to continue to travel, police said.

A phone number for Shapiro could not be located. Shapiro didn’t have an attorney listed in online court records.

An April 7 preliminary hearing is set.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-837-5374 or

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, or via Twitter .

Categories: Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.