Greensburg cops: Nude pedestrian told officer he was drinking |

Greensburg cops: Nude pedestrian told officer he was drinking

Paul Peirce

It didn’t take long for Greensburg cops to locate a nude pedestrian after receiving a complaint Friday.

City police allege that David Dreistadt, 53, of Greensburg was walking naked along Main Street downtown about 10:30 p.m., according to a complaint filed before District Judge Chris Flanigan. Dreistadt was arrested on 400 block of South Main Street in the vicinity of West 4th Street, which is on the same block as the police station.

Patrolman Justin Scalzo said he was in the process of getting into his patrol car in the police station parking lot when a female driver pulled in and said there was a nude man walking north along Main Street. Scalzo said he pulled on to Main Street and quickly spotted Dreistadt.

“There were multiple people walking near the 400 block of South Main Street that were alarmed by Dreistadt’s behavior,” Scalzo wrote in court papers.

Scalzo said when he approached Dreistadt, he began to walk away. Scalzo grabbed Dreistadt by his left arm and placed him under arrest.

At the police station, Dreistadt told police he had been “consuming an unknown amount of alcoholic beverages during the evening,” Scalzo said.

Dreistadt is charged with indecent exposure, open lewdness, disorderly conduct and public drunkenness. He was served the complaint via mailed summons, according to online court records.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.