ShareThis Page
Greensburg police seek suspect who tried to ignite gay pride flag |

Greensburg police seek suspect who tried to ignite gay pride flag

Jacob Tierney
| Tuesday, July 10, 2018 3:24 p.m
Greensburg police are looking for this person, who tried to light a flag on fire on Ludwick Street Monday, July 9, 2018.

Greensburg police are looking for a suspect who tried but failed to burn a rainbow gay pride flag hanging from the porch of a Ludwick Street home.

The residents have a security camera, which captured the incident on Monday night, according to police. The residents could not immediately be reached for comment.

Security footage shows a shirtless man walk up to the flag and hold what appears to be a lighter beneath it, according to police Capt. Robert Stafford. After a few seconds, the suspect shrugged and walked away. The camera picked up voices from unseen bystanders urging him to burn the flag, according to Stafford.

The man returned, removed the flagpole from its mounting, placed the flag on the ground and tried again to light it on fire, Stafford said. When the flag still didn’t ignite, the suspect ran off, Stafford said.

Police don’t have any leads on his identity, according to Stafford.

Anyone with information is asked to contact the City of Greensburg Police Department at 724-834-3800.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Jacob at 724-836-6646, or via Twitter .

Categories: Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.