ShareThis Page
Greensburg Salem passes preliminary budget |

Greensburg Salem passes preliminary budget

Jacob Tierney
| Wednesday, May 25, 2016 9:51 p.m

Greensburg Salem school board passed a $43.6 million preliminary budget with a 5-2 vote Wednesday, but board members and administrators said significant changes are likely before a final budget is adopted next month.

Board members Frank Gazze, Charlotte Kemerer, Richard Payha, Nicholas Rullo and Barbara Vernail supported the preliminary budget. Ronald Mellinger and Robin Savage voted against it, citing a proposed 2.7 mill tax increase and the use of more than $500,000 in reserve funds.

“I want a balanced budget, and we don’t have that,” Savage said.

Board members Jeffrey Metrosky and Stephen Thomas were not at the meeting.

The board scheduled a special meeting June 13 to hash out the budget. The final budget likely will be passed at the board’s June 29 meeting.

“This is a work-in-progress budget,” said district business manager Jim Meyer, “I can tell you, sitting here today, that these numbers are going to change.”

The preliminary budget would cost the district about $1 million more than it spent in 2015-16, with most of the increase driven by an additional $877,000 in mandatory retirement contributions.

The district is considering hiring a guidance counselor and a life skills teacher. It also will have to spend about $100,000 on software and textbooks to update its curriculum, and an additional $171,000 more than last year to send a growing number of high school students to receive vocational training at the Central Westmoreland Career and Technology Center.

The proposed tax increase would cost the average district property owner about $52 more a year.

Board members bandied about cost-cutting measures, like saving money on athletic equipment or opening up district services to a competitive bid.

“Is there anything you have in this budget that you can put out there so that people can compete, so that maybe we can see some savings?” Mellinger asked.

Meyer said major services that can be put out to bid, like food service and transportation, already have been within the last few years, and the district is locked into those contracts.

“We are trying as a district to control our costs as much as we can,” he said.

Superintendent Eileen Amato said any cuts that can be made are likely to negatively impact students.

“The things that had little impact we cut. They’re already gone,” she said.

Savage said she hopes the board can work with administrators to find savings and craft a balanced budget.

The preliminary budget will be posted on the district’s website,, within the next few days.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-836-6646 or

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Jacob at 724-836-6646, or via Twitter .

Categories: Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.