ShareThis Page
Hempfield bicyclist’s goal was another accident, insurance payment, prosecutors say |

Hempfield bicyclist’s goal was another accident, insurance payment, prosecutors say

Rich Cholodofsky
| Monday, June 26, 2017 5:30 p.m
Sean Stipp | Trib Total Media
Westmoreland County Sheriff Jonathan Held escorts David Smith, 55, away from the Westmoreland County Courthouse on July 21, 2015.

After David Smith of Hempfield was struck and injured by a drunken driver while riding his bicycle 10 years ago, he sued and won a $50,000 settlement.

Over the next decade, Smith attempted to position himself for another accident and another financial windfall, according to testimony the district attorney wants to present to jurors during the bicyclist’s trial next month. Smith is accused of eight separate incidents of obstructing traffic and creating a dangerous condition for motorists as he biked on various roadways.

“It’s ridiculous, and I think the public will understand that,” defense attorney Larry Burns said Monday in response to a document filed earlier in the day by Assistant District Attorney Anthony Iannamorelli.

Iannamorelli said jurors should be able to consider evidence that Smith’s behavior on his bicycle has been an ongoing attempt to recreate the circumstances that led to his windfall in 2007.

“This information is relevant at trial to prove motive and intent for operating his pedacycle in the subsequent cases now being tried. Indeed, it shows that defendant has benefitted monetarily from riding his pedacycle in an obstructive and disorderly manner,” Iannamorelli said.

The motion before Common Pleas Court Judge Meagan Bilik DeFazio, which is expected to be decided before trial, includes additional requests by the prosecution to present evidence that Smith’s behavior on his bicycle has been part of a long-running pattern that resulted in convictions of similar crimes in 2010 as well as numerous summary citations and traffic tickets in 2014 and 2015.

Smith, 58, has been in jail for more than a year awaiting trial on eight cases dating to 2012 in which police contend he bicycled in a manner that created dangerous situations for motorists, slowly pedaling down the center of major roadways and preventing vehicles from passing.

Jury selection in the case is scheduled to begin Aug. 7.

Iannamorelli’s evidence of a potential motive involves an incident in 2007 in which Smith was bicycling along Route 30 at night in the rain when a driver struck him from behind. Smith was thrown from the bike and was injured, and the driver was charged with drunken driving, according to the prosecution’s motion.

Burns down played the suggestion of motive but said he was considering allowing the jury to hear the evidence.

“It was a one-time incident and such a ridiculous accusation (against Smith). It says more about the district attorney than Mr. Smith,” Burns said.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-830-6293 or

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, or via Twitter .

Categories: Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.