Archive

ShareThis Page
Hempfield residents remain unhappy about school district’s assessment-appeal policy | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Hempfield residents remain unhappy about school district’s assessment-appeal policy

by PATRICK VARINE
| Monday, September 17, 2018 9:48 p.m.

Hempfield school directors raised the threshold for property tax assessment appeals by $150,000 on Monday night, but it did little for those who feel the district’s policy is singling out residents and amounts to “spot” appeals.

Residents turned out in large numbers at a previous board meeting to level criticism at the district’s assessment-appeal policy , which challenged tax assessments on properties that have sold for more than $100,000 over their assessed value.

At its meeting Monday night, the school board voted 5-4 to retain a Pittsburgh law firm that has been pursuing the appeals, and to raise the threshold to $250,000. Board President Sonya Brajdic said she hoped it would satisfy many of the more than 70 people who attended the meeting and those who signed up to speak.

It did not.

“I still think there are issues and problems with this entire program,” said resident Alan Fleissner.

“This doesn’t come across as being fair,” said Candace Cieslo, whose family moved into the district last year. “It comes off as being targeted.”

Cieslo and others said the program would discourage developers from investing in the district.

“Why would anyone invest in a community if they feel their taxing system is unstable?” she asked.

Resident Wayne Freed referenced two bills in the state’s previous General Assembly session aimed at curbing the assessment-appeal process statewide, and asked the board to wait until Pennsylvania lawmakers decide what direction to go.

Resident Nancy Fischione received an assessment-appeal letter but found out Monday night that, with the dollar figure bumped up to $250,000, she is no longer affected.

“This process is still wrong,” she told the board. “What you’ve probably done is change this crowd to a new crowd, once they receive letters.”

Pittsburgh law firm Andrews & Price was retained by the district to carry out the appeals assessments. Brajdic and board members Jeanne Smith, Diane Ciabattoni, Michele Fischer and David Iwig voted to modify the policy.

Resident Dana Smith said he has spoken with several homeowners in anticipation of a possible legal challenge.

“This is principally wrong,” Smith said. “Please do not force me into a court of law. I will not back down.”

Smith and other residents accused the board of singling out individual homeowners for assessment appeals.

“We as a district do not go out and do spot assessments,” Brajdic said. “That is not our job.”

Resident Scott Graham said the district should get out of the assessment business.

“Property assessments should be the responsibility of Westmoreland County government, not the Hempfield Area School District,” Graham said.

Westmoreland has not had a countywide reassessment since 1973.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, pvarine@tribweb.com or via Twitter @MurrysvilleStar.


243518gtrHempAppeal091818
Above, Hempfield Area School District school board members at their meeting on Monday, Sept. 18, 2018. The board voted 5-4 to modify its appeal policy for property-tax assessments.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.