ShareThis Page
Indecent assault trial of North Huntingdon pizzeria owner to start |

Indecent assault trial of North Huntingdon pizzeria owner to start

Rich Cholodofsky
| Monday, December 11, 2017 4:51 p.m

Testimony is expected to begin Tuesday in the trial of North Huntingdon pizza shop owner accused of having improper sexual contact with his employees.

Jurors were seated on Monday to hear the case against Cesare Tiano, 64, of Monroeville, who police claim made sexual advances to seven female workers at Grande Pizza on Route 30, including at least one teenager.

Police said Tiano hugged the women in attempts to feel their breasts, slapped or grabbed them and moaned, and licked or whispered in their ears, according to the criminal complaint.

Workers also claimed Tiano solicited oral sex, offered to pay for nude photos and videos of them, attempted to kiss them and routinely made lewd comments about their bodies, according to court records.

Tiano, through his attorney Casey White, has denied the allegations. He is charged with seven counts each of indecent assault and harassment.

The trial, before Westmoreland County Common Pleas Court Judge Meagan Bilik-DeFazio, is expected to last about five days.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-830-6293 or

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, or via Twitter .

Categories: Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.