ShareThis Page
Indignant woman scolds armed duo in Jeannette |

Indignant woman scolds armed duo in Jeannette

Richard Gazarik
| Monday, November 11, 2013 11:59 p.m
Sean Stipp | Tribune-Review
Margie Baker talks to the media about the two men, armed with a handgun, who entered her Jeannette home on Sunday Nov. 10, 2013, demanding she open the safe.
Sean Stipp | Tribune-Review
Chad Snyder, 32, of the Smithton-Rostraver area, is a suspect in a home invasion in Jeannette on Sunday, Nov 10, 2013.
Joshua Churchfield, 26, of McKeesport has been charged in a home invasion in Jeannette on Sunday, Nov 10, 2013.

Margie Baker of Jeannette was making bread crumbs for eggplant Parmesan in her kitchen on Sunday night when she heard a window air conditioner crash to the floor.

Two men wearing black clothing, gloves and ski masks climbed through the open window about 8 p.m., pointed a handgun at her and demanded that she open her safe.

The 62-year-old stood her ground.

“Go ahead, shoot me,” she said. “You’ll never get anything out of the safe.”

One man placed the gun to her temple and told her to “get moving,” so she complied.

She said the two men took $5,000 worth of jewelry and gold coins.

Baker said she was too angry to be scared, and she scolded the robbers for damaging her window.

“What do you think you guys are doing here?” she told the men. “Don’t you have something better to do?”

Baker followed the robbers out the door as she was dialing 911.

They didn’t get far.

Jeannette police officers Justin Scalzo and James Phillips, along with canine officer Falco, ran down one suspect a block from Baker’s home on North Third Street.

Joshua Churchfield, 26, of McKeesport was cornered by Falco on North Fourth Street. Scalzo said police are searching for the second suspect, Chad Snyder, 32, of the Smithton-Rostraver area. Snyder called police and promised to surrender later Tuesday, Scalzo said.

Police said a third person may have been involved in the home invasion. Scalzo said the robbers knew Baker had a safe and where it was located.

“We don’t feel this was a random home invasion,” Scalzo said. “These people somehow knew the victim.”

Baker lives alone and said she gets by on an income of $500 a month.

“I can barely manage on my own now,” she said. “I was just too (expletive) off to bother. I wasn’t scared or angry.”

“She handled herself very well,” Scalzo said.

Scalzo said he was responding to the 911 call when he saw two men matching the robbers’ description drive past in a red car. He said the men had a “deer in the headlights look.”

He pursued the vehicle. When the suspects stopped and Scalzo approached their car, both men jumped out.

Falco tracked down Churchfield, who had jumped over a 6-foot fence. Scalzo said his dog chased Churchfield down a hill and got entangled in the suspect’s legs. When Scalzo arrived, Churchfield was staring at the dog, afraid to move.

When Scalzo and Phillips tried to handcuff Churchfield, he resisted, prompting the dog to force him into submission, according to police.

A search of the car turned up clothing matching the description of the suspects’ and a pellet gun. Jewelry and coins were inside the jacket pockets, Scalzo said.

Churchfield was charged with burglary, robbery, escape, conspiracy, resisting arrest, loitering and criminal trespass. He is in Westmoreland County Prison in lieu of $250,000 bond.

Richard Gazarik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6292 or at

Categories: Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.