Irwin council override means 3-mill real estate tax increase |

Irwin council override means 3-mill real estate tax increase

Joe Napsha

Irwin property owners will pay an additional 3 mills in real estate taxes next year now that borough council voted unanimously to override the mayor’s veto of the 20 percent increase to fund the 2016 budget.

Council members Michael Pochan, Deborah Kelly, Gail Macioce, John Cassandro and Robert Dittman voted at a special meeting Saturday to override Mayor Robert Wayman’s Dec. 16 veto of the ordinance that raised the millage to 18 mills to support the $5.15 million budget. The budget with the tax increase initially was approved Dec. 9 by a 4-2 vote, with Peggie Watson and Joanna Jordan opposing it and the tax increase.

Wayman and Jordan, who has been acting council president since Watson abruptly resigned Dec. 9, did not attend the special meeting. Dittman, who was appointed by council Dec. 9 to fill the remaining two years of Phyllis Thiem’s term, was attending his first council meeting.

The mayor could not be reached for comment.

In vetoing the tax hike, Wayman said the rationale “is based on false premises and is inconsistent with the facts and the laws of mathematics.”

Wayman had characterized the tax increase as unnecessary and unfair because Irwin has a capital reserve fund with more than $600,000, as well as $99,000 from the sale of property to the Western Westmoreland Municipal Authority. The money from the property sale is greater than the estimated $90,000 that is generated from 3 mills of property taxes, Wayman said.

After the meeting, Pochan said taking $90,000 from the capital reserve account would have reduced that account by too much.

“Using the $100,000 (from the property sale) is a temporary fix” because of the increase in expenditures, Pochan said.

During the past four years, councils should have increased property taxes by 1 mill, which would have lessened the tax hike for 2016, Pochan said.

Macioce said she voted to reinstate the 3-mill tax hike because she believed it is necessary. Macioce said she disagreed with Wayman’s rationale that council could have tapped the capital reserve fund or the money from the property sale, saying they should not use a one-time revenue stream to fund ongoing operations.

“We will decide what best to do with the money,” Macioce said.

Joe Napsha is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-5252 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.