ShareThis Page
Jeannette Glass site officially in hands of redevelopment group |

Jeannette Glass site officially in hands of redevelopment group

| Tuesday, August 30, 2016 10:42 p.m
Sean Stipp | Tribune-Review
Environmental issues remain to be addressed at the former Jeannette Glass site.

A New York company’s three-decade stewardship of the former Jeannette Glass plant officially ended with the scrawl of a judge’s pen and the formal filing of a deed that transferred ownership of the blighted 13-acre site to a county agency.

Although the Westmoreland County Industrial Development Corp. purchased the property in a 2012 tax sale, the transfer wasn’t finalized until a court session concluded Tuesday to determine the current value of the site, which sat dormant during 33 years of failed promises, abandoned plans and lengthy litigation.

“This long city tragedy of the Zion ownership of this site is finally over. Now, we can look eagerly to see what the county is able to develop,” said Jeannette solicitor Scott Avolio.

The plant, once a centerpiece in the city’s industrial landscape, was in bankruptcy in 1983 when it was purchased for $4 million by businessman Abe Zion, who promised to reopen it. Zion, who died in April, hired Russian scientists to manufacture a new form of unbreakable glass to be used as roofing tiles and secured grants to help pay for the endeavor.

Despite the promises and government funding, the plant never reopened. The scientists Zion hired sued him for breach of contract and defamation. In the mid-1990s, Zion was accused of influence peddling among city officials, a contention that led to the mayor’s resignation and the firing of its solicitor.

Still, Zion pushed to reopen the glass plant and continued to pay property taxes through 2010 even as structures on the property deteriorated.

The fight appeared to end in 2012, when the industrial development group paid $305,000 for the property in a tax sale. Zion’s company challenged the validity of the sale until this year, when the state Supreme Court upheld the action.

The final hurdle was to settle a property assessment appeal that Zion’s company filed over the valuation of the site, which calculated the land to be worth more than $2.5 million for taxing purposes.

Attorneys for the county, city and the Zion Bullitt Avenue Limited Partnership met Tuesday before the start of a hearing on the assessment appeal and struck a deal that substantially reduced the value of the former glass plant, which had been set decades ago.

Judge Anthony Marsili signed a court order that set the value at $795,419 for the 2013 tax year. The value will increase each year through 2017, when the property will have a market value of $1.15 million.

“This will allow the record to be closed and give the IDC the ability to develop the property,” said John Ward, a lawyer for the county agency.

Tim Andrews, solicitor for the county tax claim bureau, said the court agreement allows money withheld from proceeds of the sale to be disbursed to the city, county and Jeannette City School District.

The Zion company has until Thursday to remove any personal items from the property, county officials said.

Officials anticipate that final cleanup of industrial waste can begin so the property can be rehabilitated and sold.

“We will be working in close cooperation with the (Department of Environmental Protection) to devise a plan that remedies all environmental issues,” said Jason Rigone, executive director of the industrial development group. “It is our plan to begin this work in September.”

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-830-6293 or

Categories: Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.