ShareThis Page
Jeannette woman gets probation in theft |

Jeannette woman gets probation in theft

Rich Cholodofsky
| Wednesday, November 16, 2016 7:06 a.m

A Jeannette woman will serve seven years on probation for stealing from a credit union where she worked as a teller.

Martina Papa, 64, apologized before a Westmoreland County judge Tuesday for stealing more than $42,000 over a period of years from the Teamsters Local 30 Federal Credit Union.

“I am very sorry for all the problems I caused. I am asking for forgiveness,” Papa said before being sentenced by Judge Christopher Feliciani to probation, which includes a year of home confinement.

Papa worked at the credit union for more seven years. On numerous occasions, she took small amounts of cash and falsified records to indicate money had been deposited in the bank, police said.

Papa pleaded guilty to theft charges in August.

Defense attorney Matthew Schimizzi said Papa maintained she was coerced by a credit union official, who has since died, to take the money on his behalf then continued to take more cash to help her repay loans she secured from the financial organization. The thefts eventually were discovered in 2015 during a routine audit of credit union finances.

Papa chose to halt falsifying records as a means to end the thefts prior to the audit, Schimizzi said.

“It was just a situation where she got into it and couldn’t get out,” Schimizzi said.

Feliciani said he imposed a mitigated sentence to keep Papa out of jail as “mercy,” noting her lack of a prior criminal record and a need to care for an ailing spouse.

“It only leads me to a conclusion that the criminal activity is not reflective of your character,” Feliciani said.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-830-6293 or

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, or via Twitter .

Categories: Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.