ShareThis Page
Juvenile status hearing, trial delayed in Franklin Regional stabbings |

Juvenile status hearing, trial delayed in Franklin Regional stabbings

Rich Cholodofsky
| Friday, May 29, 2015 10:06 a.m
Sean Stipp | Trib Total Media
Alex Hribal is led into the Westmoreland County Courthouse by Sheriff Jonathan Held on Friday, Sept. 26, 2014. Hribal is accused of stabbing and slashing 21 people at Franklin Regional High School in April.

A Westmoreland County teen charged with trying to kill 20 classmates and a school security guard will next appear in court June 22.

Westmoreland County Judge Chris Feliciani will hear evidence as to whether 17-year-old Alex Hribal should be tried as a juvenile.

Hribal is charged as an adult with 21 counts each of attempted murder and aggravated assault, as well as a weapons offense, for the knife attacks on April 9, 2014, at Franklin Regional High School.

Hribal has been held in the county’s juvenile detention center since his arrest. His defense lawyer maintains the teen should be prosecuted in juvenile court because of his mental condition.

Hribal’s hearing was scheduled to be held Friday, but on April 1 it was delayed when District Attorney John Peck said the stabbing victims wouldn’t be available to testify.

In court documents filed last month, Peck said the victims, some of whom were seriously injured, were taking final exams at Franklin Regional and couldn’t leave school.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, or via Twitter .

Categories: Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.