ShareThis Page
Latrobe OKs $163K contracts for replacing roof, repairing storm inlet |

Latrobe OKs $163K contracts for replacing roof, repairing storm inlet

Jeff Himler
| Monday, August 13, 2018 10:15 p.m
Floodwater that overran a ditch just upstream of Latrobe’s Josephine Street on June 20, 2018, is seen from the parking lot of the Latrobe First Church of God, on Princeton Street, looking northeast toward Raymond Avenue.

Latrobe’s cost for a storm inlet repair on Josephine Street is within estimates, but the price for replacing the roof on the city municipal building doubled once the initial low bidder discovered it had miscalculated.

City council Monday awarded the storm project to Lloyd Excavating of Latrobe, whose bid of $33,978 was the lowest among three received to repair an inlet and pipe damaged during June 20 flooding in and around the Lincoln Road Shopping Plaza.

That bid is in line with what officials expected, according to city manager Wayne Jones. “We figured it would be around $35,000,” he said.

City officials have said a footbridge that washed downstream during flash flooding blocked openings of three pipes in the Josephine Street inlet while other debris collected in a fence, forming a dam. Those obstructions added to high water that rushed into the first floors of several nearby businesses and also flooded a local church and homes, according to officials.

The project calls for replacing a 15-foot section of the three side-by-side pipes, repairing one that was crushed, and installing a metal cage and grating to help keep debris from blocking the pipes during future storms.

The city will attempt to find room in its budget to cover the unexpected costs. But, Jones said, it may have to tap into its capital reserve to pay for the project. He said the city so far this year has incurred about $50,000 in flood-response costs that “we weren’t planning to spend.”

Work should begin soon on the storm improvements. “It has to be done,” Jones said.

Council on Monday also awarded a $129,400 contract to TRS Roofing, for replacing the aging roof on the municipal building. Leaks in the roof have cropped up during heavy rains, resulting in damage to ceiling tiles, public works director Michael Gray has said.

TRS was among four firms that submitted proposals in a second round of bidding on the project. Council rejected all initial bids it had sought in April after the low bidder in that round – Good Roof LLC – discovered an error in its calculations.

The bid of $59,985 “did not include an estimate for the entire building,” city solicitor Zachary Kansler explained.

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jeff at 724-836-6622, or via Twitter @jhimler_news.

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Jeff by email at or via Twitter .

Categories: Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.