Lawyers for John Kunco: Child molestation charges no reason to jail him before retrial in rape case |

Lawyers for John Kunco: Child molestation charges no reason to jail him before retrial in rape case

John Kunco

An Allegheny County man awaiting retrial for rape of a New Kensington woman nearly three decades ago wants to be released from jail, saying his arrest last month on allegations of child sexual assault is not sufficient to keep him behind bars.

Attorneys for John Kunco, 53, filed court documents Friday asking Westmoreland County Common Pleas Court Judge Christopher Feliciani to reinstate bail. The judge last month revoked Kunco’s $10,000 unsecured bail after he was charged in Allegheny County with sex crimes related to allegations made by a 7-year-old girl.

Lawyers with the Innocence Project of New York contend Kunco should not be held in custody without bond for the 1991 rape case.

“Absolutely none of the facts have changed regarding the illegitimacy of the conviction for which he has now demonstrated his innocence and which this court vacated based on the irrefutable evidence presented,” his lawyers wrote.

A jury convicted Kunco for raping a woman in 1990 inside her New Kensington apartment. He was sentenced to serve 45-to-90 years in prison.

In subsequent appeals, Kunco’s lawyers maintained the evidence used to convict him was insufficient, including healed bite marks on the victim’s arms that were matched to Kunco, as well as the lack of any DNA evidence to indicate he was present at the rape scene.

Feliciani in May granted Kunco a new trial, saying he didn’t believe the evidence presented at trial was enough to support the conviction.

Following his release, police in Allegheny County said Kunco molested the young girl. He was charged with aggravated indecent assault and other related crimes but released on $25,000 bail.

A day after his release, Feliciani revoked Kunco’s bond in the rape case, which Westmoreland County prosecutors say they intended to retry. No trial date has been set.

Kunco has denied the new allegations and is scheduled to appear for a preliminary hearing in McKees Rocks on Sept. 28.

His lawyers said there is no evidence to support the new allegations and that since his release Kunco was hired as a maintenance worker at a Pittsburgh grocery and restaurant.

“Mr. Kunco’s behavior since his May release has been exemplary, and Mr. Kunco respectfully requests that the court look to the entirety of his record and his history before this court in conjunction with the shocking presentation of the recent allegations,” his lawyers wrote.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293 or [email protected]

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.