ShareThis Page
Ligonier Township planners offer suggested changes to zoning proposal |

Ligonier Township planners offer suggested changes to zoning proposal

Nicole Chynoweth
| Friday, February 27, 2015 12:01 a.m

Ligonier Township’s planning commission is suggesting to the supervisors several changes to the proposed zoning ordinance.

During its meeting on Thursday, the board voted to recommend increasing the 200-foot buffer zone around unnamed perennial streams to 325 feet, increasing the setback from a well site to a protected structure from 650 feet to 750 feet and removing cell phone towers as a conditional use in the R-1 residential zone.

Board members Scott Gongaware and Eric Schreiber were absent.

Township manager Terry Carcella and solicitor Michael Korns outlined changes that had been made to the ordinance and map since a meeting for public comment on the ordinance was held Feb. 17. Carcella said an area previously zoned industrial across from the Sheetz along Route 271 was changed to C-2 highway commercial and the R-1 residential zones in Waterford and near the Valley School of Ligonier were expanded. The Ligonier Valley High School and Valley School of Ligonier now have a half-mile “no-drill zone” around them. The natural resource protection overlay has been expanded by Laurel Ridge State Park and Laurel Mountain ski area. He said the permitted width of billboard signs has been decreased from 700 feet to 250 feet.

Korns said the unconventional drilling provisions are now included in the body of the ordinance under conditional uses. It was previously a separate section of the ordinance.

Susan Huba, executive director of the Loyalhanna Watershed Association, suggested the board consider making the 200-foot buffer around unnamed perennial streams 650 feet, like the named streams. Additionally, she urged the board to change areas in Wilpen, Waterford and Laughlintown where potential sewage expansion could occur from agricultural to R-1 residential. She asked that they expand the natural resource protection overlay by the Latrobe Reservoir further south along the western border of the township and expand protection by the southeastern border of the township near Linn Run and Laurel Summit State Parks.

Board members said they will review the information Huba submitted.

During public comment, several residents again asked about board members potentially having conflicts of interest in voting on the zoning ordinance. For instance, chairman Mark Spitzer has an oil and gas lease.

Korns said he is still awaiting an advisory opinion from the State Ethics Commission.

Spitzer said five years ago when he joined the commission he made it known to the solicitor that he had an oil and gas lease and told Korns when work on the zoning ordinance began. He said he was told it would not be a conflict of interest, and he said even if he had abstained from voting on the ordinance last month, the motion still would have passed.

“Anybody voting on this has a potential interest in the zoning ordinance,” said board member Kevin McVicker. “Any of this could affect any of us on a financial basis.”

In other business, Korns informed the board that the supervisors at their next meeting will discuss the status of the hearing on a conditional use application from Pittsburgh SMSA L.P., doing business as Verizon Wireless, to build a cell phone tower in the Ligonier Valley Cemetery.

The hearing on the application was opened in August, but the company’s legal counsel requested a postponement to address engineering concerns.

A public hearing on the zoning ordinance is scheduled for 6 p.m. March 26 at the Ligonier Valley High School auditorium.

Nicole Chynoweth is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-850-2862 or

Categories: Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.