Missing expert report sought before new sentencing trial for Melvin Knight |

Missing expert report sought before new sentencing trial for Melvin Knight

Melvin Knight

Attorneys for Melvin Knight have two weeks to give prosecutors details collected from a taxpayer-funded expert hired to prepare trial evidence to determine if he again gets a death sentence for the 2010 torture slaying of a mentally disabled woman.

During a hearing Friday before Westmoreland County Common Pleas Judge Rita Hathaway, defense lawyers Tim Dawson and James Robinson said that despite paying a New York expert for her work over the last year, they have yet to receive any written reports regarding Knight’s case.

“It’s a dispute over money, and we never got a report. She asked for an additional $5,000,” Robinson said.

Knight, 28, formerly of Swissvale, Allegheny County, is on death row after he pleaded guilty to first-degree murder for his role in killing 30-year-old Jennifer Daugherty. He was sentenced to die by lethal injection. A state appeals court overturned his death sentence and ordered a new trial to determine his penalty.

Knight was one of six Greensburg roommates convicted in Daugherty’s torture and killing. Prosecutors said she was held captive for more than two days and stabbed to death. Her body was found bound in Christmas lights and garland and stuffed into a trash can that was discarded under a truck in a snow-covered parking lot.

In preparing for Knight’s second sentencing trial, which is scheduled for jury selection to begin Oct. 29, the defense hired three experts to assist with preparing the case in which they will seek life prison term without the possibility for parole.

The judge last year authorized the defense to pay New York mitigation specialist Jennifer Wynn up to $10,000 to research Knight’s background in preparation for the trial. According to court records, Wynn was paid $7,117 from Westmoreland County for her work. Details about Knight she learned were included in reports generated by two other defense-hired experts, information that was shared with prosecutors.

Wynn was not expected to be called as a witness at trial, Dawson said.

Wynn, who is listed as an associate professor of criminal justice at City University in New York, could not be reached for comment.

The prosecution needs to see all of the information compiled by Wynn in order for its expert to prepare a report that will be used to attempt to convince jurors to impose a death sentence, District Attorney John Peck and Assistant District Attorney Leo Ciaramitaro said.

“We need to see the same stuff their experts used,” Ciaramitaro said.

The judge ordered defense attorneys to contact Wynn in an effort to have her detail her work. Prosecutors have to give the defense reports from its own experts at the start of the trial, the judge ruled.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293 or [email protected]

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.