ShareThis Page
Murrysville gas drilling debate continues |

Murrysville gas drilling debate continues

| Tuesday, December 15, 2015 11:15 p.m
Barry Reeger | Trib Total Media
The Murrysville planning commission is set to discuss and make recommendations about changes to borough gas drilling laws to council during its Dec. 15 meeting.

Murrysville planning officials and residents Tuesday discussed a proposed ordinance that would add regulations for unconventional natural gas drilling in the municipality as part of a process that allows Murrysville council to move forward with consideration of the proposal.

The proposed ordinance includes additional setbacks from well pads and other requirements not included in Murrysville’s current ordinance that regulates unconventional natural gas drilling.

Council voted in October to declare the proposed ordinance “pending” and to seek input from the local planning commission and Westmoreland County planners. At the meeting Tuesday, planning commission members offered their comments and allowed residents to speak on the proposed ordinance.

The proposal stems from a review of the current drilling ordinance — passed in 2011 — that Murrysville officials began last year following a state Supreme Court ruling that overturned much of a 2012 state law that restricted local governments from regulating drilling.

Loren Kase, council’s liaison to the planning commission, said council will bring the ordinance up for a vote at some point.

Westmoreland County planners couldn’t be reached to comment on the proposal.

The proposal has drawn criticism from industry representatives and local landowners who say it is too restrictive on drilling activity.

“The ordinance has problems both from a preemption perspective as well as under the municipality’s planning code,” said Chris Nestor, a Harrisburg attorney representing some Murrysville landowners.

He declined to elaborate on which aspects of it present problems.

Alyson Holt, who ran for council but lost in the Nov. 3 election, told officials she wanted to see setbacks increased beyond those in the proposal, but “in its entirety” it would be “much more protective of the constitutional rights of all residents than the 2011 ordinance was.”

Planning commission member William Yant Jr. said he thought the nine-member municipal Marcellus task force that convened to help develop Murrysville’s drilling regulations didn’t include any representation from the natural gas industry.

“There was zero representation from industry professionals or academics, engineers, geologists, those types of people, and, given that makeup, I can’t understand that we could achieve a balanced report,” Yant said.

Commission member Michael Caruso defended the lack of leaseholders or industry representatives on that committee.

“I think that input is kind of skewed in a way that doesn’t provide balance,” Caruso said.

The proposed ordinance would require buffers of 250 feet around drilling well pad sites and an additional 750 feet beyond that buffer yard for all “protected structures,” defined as “any occupied structure with walls and a roof within which persons live or customarily work located within the defined setback area.” Homeowners living within the setbacks, however, could sign a waiver to allow a drilling operation closer than the setbacks.

It would remove references to unconventional drilling as a “land development,” which made it subject to municipal subdivision and land-development ordinances, according to members of the municipal Marcellus task force.

It would classify operations that use compressors, motors or engines as part of the operations — or which produce air-contaminant emissions or offensive odors — as conditional-use operations in areas zoned for business use. Conditional-use operations would require approval from municipal officials.

It would include an “Oil and Gas Recovery Overlay District” section. The district — which allows surface drilling in about 40 percent of the municipality — was established in 2011, but the section was not included in the existing ordinance.

Gideon Bradshaw is a Trib Total Media staff writer. He can be reached at or 724-836-6660.

Categories: Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.