Norwin school board fails to fill vacancy, could be up to county judges |

Norwin school board fails to fill vacancy, could be up to county judges

Evan R. Sanders | Tribune-Review
A Norwin School District bus travels along McMahon Drive in North Huntingdon on Monday, Aug. 22, 2016.

Westmoreland County Common Pleas judges likely will have to fill a vacancy on the Norwin School Board.

Board members still have not agreed on a replacement for Shawn Petrisko, who resigned Aug. 20. Nine candidates applied for the position, said Robert Perkins, board president.

When former director Rebecca Gediminskas and William Essay were nominated at the Sept. 10, neither candidate garnered five votes from the seven members present. The board did not vote to fill the position at its meeting Monday.

The deadline for the board to select a replacement is Thursday — which is 30 days after Petrisko’s resignation. Perkins, who has been on the board for 18 years, said he could not recall a previous time when the court had to select one of the school directors.

The county’s 10 judges will get to appoint a board member if 10 or more Norwin voters petition the judges to select someone, said Falco Muscante, district solicitor. The judges likely would advertise for candidates and then conduct interviews before selecting someone. There is no deadline prescribed in the school code for when the judges would have to make a decision, Muscante said.

If no one petitions the court to appoint a board member, Muscante said the school board will operate with eight members until another member is elected next year. Petrisko’s term was to expire in December 2019.

Responding to a suggestion that the school board petition the court to appoint a candidate, Director Barb Viola questioned why the board would do that when “we could not do it ourselves.”

Viola claimed that one current member threatened to resign if one of the nine applicants were appointed. She did not identify the board member or the candidate that person opposed.

Viola said that none of the directors should “feign indignation” at Petrisko’s resignation, then “buckle to the threat of another’s attempt to sway the vote.”

Gediminskas received the support from Donald Rhodes, Dennis Rittenhouse, Viola and Perkins. Gediminskas lost her bid for re-election in the November 2017 general election.

Essay was favored by Brian Carlton, Tracey Czajkowski and Raymond Kocak.

Director Darlene Ciocca attended the Sept. 10 meeting, but had to leave before the vote. Rhodes was absent Monday.

The other candidates interested in the position are Ronald Giuliana, Robert L. Henry, Amy Johnson, Anthony Legge, Kimberly Pickett, Wayne Washowich and Gerald O’Donnell Jr.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252 or [email protected]

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.