Penn-Trafford teachers say they won’t strike as long as negotiations stay ‘positive’ |

Penn-Trafford teachers say they won’t strike as long as negotiations stay ‘positive’


Penn-Trafford teachers say they will not go on strike as long as contract negotiations continue in a “positive manner,” according to a joint statement released Thursday.

The statement by Superintendent Matthew Harris and Penn-Trafford Education Association President Shaun Rinier came a day after the union leadership said a strike was inevitable.

“The PTEA will not call a strike on Friday … due to the progress made at Wednesday’s negotiating session,” the statement said.

The statement noted that a strike next week would interfere with the school district’s annual field trip to the Deer Valley YMCA Family Camp in Somerset County and would be “extremely burdensome” to parents, students and teachers who planned for the trip.

Representatives of the union and school board met at 4 p.m. Wednesday to continue negotiations.

“Both sides agreed to continue working together to reach final agreement in a timely manner and which would be fair to both parties,” the statement said.

The union said it will submit a new offer in time for the school board to review it in executive session on Monday. The negotiating teams plan to meet again Tuesday.

“The PTEA is cautiously optimistic that continued bargaining will achieve a contract settlement within the next several weeks,” the statement said.

The 250-member union originally had planned to vote Thursday on a six-year tentative agreement. That vote was canceled over concerns that the agreement would prevent teachers already on the first level of the 17-step salary scale from advancing to another level this school year.

Teachers are working under an extension of a four-year contract that expired on June 30.

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, [email protected] or via Twitter @shuba_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.