ShareThis Page
Pennsylvania turnpike lanes reopen after 2-vehicle crash in Westmoreland |

Pennsylvania turnpike lanes reopen after 2-vehicle crash in Westmoreland

Paul Peirce
| Friday, August 18, 2017 11:54 a.m
Shane Dunlap | Tribune-Review
Traffic backs up on the turnpike Friday, Aug. 18, 2017 after a multiple vehicle crash occurred near mile marker 84.8 in Mount Pleasant Township.

The westbound lanes of the Pennsylvania Turnpike in Mt. Pleasant Township were open again Friday afternoon, hours after a two-vehicle accident blocked traffic for miles.

The accident was reported at westbound milemarker 84.8 between the New Stanton and Donegal interchanges at 11:30 a.m. Friday.

State police said at least one person was injured — Laura Elvin, 51, of Doylestown — when the Honda Pilot she was driving collided with a Volvo tractor-trailer. Information was unavailable about the truck driver or the extent of Elvin’s injuries and the status of two passengers in her car — Perry Elvin, 52, and Sophie Elvin, 20, whom police said may have been injured.

According to police, Elvin, who was driving in the right lane, swerved into the left lane, in front of the truck. The truck swerved to the left, in an attempt to avoid a collision, but crashed into the center median and into the driver’s side of the car.

Several emergency crews responded.

Traffic was halted through the stretch because of the accident, according to the turnpike’s website.

No further information was available.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, or via Twitter .

Categories: Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.