Police: East Huntingdon man was speeding in 2017 crash that killed Washington Township firefighter |

Police: East Huntingdon man was speeding in 2017 crash that killed Washington Township firefighter


An East Huntingdon man allegedly was speeding last year when a truck he was driving slammed into oncoming traffic , killing a Washington Township firefighter and injuring four others, according to state police.

Authorities allege Andrew Davidovich, 21, was traveling at least 63 mph in a 55 mph zone.

He was charged Thursday with homicide by vehicle, reckless endangerment and related offenses. He is free on $150,000 unsecured bond.

Troopers said in court papers that Davidovich was driving a Ford F350 south on Route 66 in Washington Township at 3:22 p.m. on June 9, 2017. The truck — with Drew’s Mowing Service written on the side — crossed over the center line and side-swiped a car before colliding with a Jeep Grand Cherokee being driven by Matthew R. Gibbons, 32.

Gibbons was pronounced dead at the scene. His girlfriend and two children ages 4 and 7, who all were passengers in his Jeep, were flown by medical helicopter to Pittsburgh hospitals for treatment. The driver of the car was injured, police said.

Davidovich told troopers at the scene that “he didn’t remember” what happened. He was bleeding from the face and nose, police said in a criminal complaint. He was treated at a hospital.

“Davidovich stated he was driving and the next thing he knew, he woke up in a car crash,” police reported.

An Oct. 22 preliminary hearing is set. An attorney listed for him could not immediately be reached.

Gibbons was a first lieutenant with the Washington Township Fire Company and was a former member of Apollo Hose Company #2 Fire Department.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter @byrenatta.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.