ShareThis Page
South Huntingdon animal shelter landlord gets probation in trespassing case |

South Huntingdon animal shelter landlord gets probation in trespassing case

Liz Zemba
| Thursday, May 5, 2016 11:00 p.m

A South Huntingdon woman accused of trespassing on property she rents to the Yukon Pet Adoption League will serve a year of probation under terms of a plea bargain that calls for her not to have any contact with the animal shelter.

Barbara Flanigan, 67, on Thursday entered no-contest pleas to charges of defiant trespass, harassment and disorderly conduct in two separate cases.

Flanigan is accused of blocking a water truck on the shelter’s Spring Street property in October 2014 and ignoring a no-trespass order the following month. Flanigan said she is innocent of the charges, but she told Judge Meagan Bilik-DeFazio she entered the pleas to avoid a possible jury conviction and incarceration.

“The only reason is because I talked to Miss (Tamara) Mahady and she says it’s probably in my best interest to do this, rather than go to jail,” Flanigan said. “I’ll do it just because of that.”

Mahady is Flanigan’s public defender. A plea of no contest is not an admission of guilt, but it is treated as such for sentencing purposes.

Bilik-DeFazio ordered Flanigan to continue with mental health treatment and to limit her contact with the shelter to periodic inspections of the property. Flanigan is to relay messages to the shelter via their attorney, Ashley Lovelace of Greensburg.

Flanigan said it will be difficult to limit contact with the shelter because it’s on the same property as her house, which sits next door, and some utility costs are shared. In addition, she accused shelter personnel of harassing her.

“These people say hurtful things about my husband, who died building that shelter,” Flanigan said. “You really think … I’ll walk away, and say nothing?”

Bilik-DeFazio advised Flanigan to ignore the alleged harassment.

“You need to have no response,” Bilik-DeFazio said. “You need to keep your mouth shut.”

Lovelace denied Flanigan’s allegations. She declined additional comment, citing an ongoing civil case in which the shelter is attempting to “work out a resolution” with Flanigan.

In the civil case, Flanigan is attempting to evict the shelter on the grounds it violated its 99-year lease when it allowed insurance coverage to lapse in 2014. The shelter since 2001 has paid Flanigan $1 a year to lease the property.

Flanigan blamed the lease for the ongoing feud.

“All of this is just the fact they rent my property for a dollar a year,” Flanigan said. “I founded it. I ran it for 25 years. Then they wanted to get rid of me.”

Flanigan has been at odds with the shelter for a number of years, contending it reneged on an agreement to pay her property taxes as compensation for low rent. She founded the shelter more than 25 years ago and was a board member until she was fired as its director in November 2013.

In court Thursday, Flanigan lamented about not having access to the rented portion of her property.

“I can’t even walk across my own property … without being charged with trespassing,” Flanigan said. “They rent from me. It seems incredibly unfair where this whole thing is.”

Liz Zemba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-601-2166 or

Categories: Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.