State police in Greensburg seeking identity of man using stolen credit information |

State police in Greensburg seeking identity of man using stolen credit information


State police in Greensburg are trying to identify a man who attempted to make several large purchases at area stores using credit information stolen from a Greensburg area woman.

Troopers obtained photographs of the man attempting to use the woman’s stolen credit card number at several businesses in Hempfield. The man bought $2,000 worth of goods on her Discover account at the Giant Eagle grocery store at Hempfield Square on June 26, Trooper Branden Snyder reported.

Store officials said the suspect, a black male, purchased multiple Amazon gift cards amounting to $2,000 and had credit information that indicated he was using a company account, police reported. Snyder said the victim reported she still had the credit card in her possession, but did not make a purchase.

Also on June 26, the man attempted to make a second purchase for $1,274 at Home Depot, also located in Hempfield. That purchase was declined, Snyder said.

The suspect also attempted to make a third purchase in late June at another area Giant Eagle store for $1,483, police said. That transaction was declined.

Anyone with information on the suspect’s identity is asked to contact state police at 724-832-3288.

Last year, some 16.7 million Americans — an 8 percent increase over 2016 — were victims of identity fraud, according to an annual report from Javelin Strategy & Research . Total loss was estimated at $16.8 billion, the report found.

Identity fraud is defined as when someone is victimized by the unauthorized use of their personal information for illicit financial gain — such as using a stolen payment card or number to make fraudulent purchases or using that information to opening fraudulent new accounts.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.