ShareThis Page
State trooper, Greensburg resident gets probation for DUI arrest |

State trooper, Greensburg resident gets probation for DUI arrest

Rich Cholodofsky
| Wednesday, November 29, 2017 4:39 p.m

A Pennsylvania state trooper will serve probation for a drunken driving arrest, a Westmoreland County judge ruled Wednesday.

Leah K. Conners, 50, of Greensburg, was discovered April 27 outside of a McDonald’s restaurant in Salem Township when police responded to a call that a woman was passed out in a truck the parking lot.

According to court records, police said Conners was found with slurred speech, blood-shot eyes and later admitted to have consumed “some” alcoholic beverages.

In court on Wednesday, Conners was admitted into the Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition program for first time offenders. Admission into the program is not considered an admission of guilt.

Common Pleas Court Judge Meagan Bilik-DeFazio sentenced Conners to serve one year on probation. Once she completes her probation, Conners can ask to have her criminal record expunged.

Ryan Tarkowski, a spokesman for the state police in Harrisburg, said Conners, a sergeant based at Troop T barracks in Somerset County, is on restricted duty pending the outcome of an internal investigation.

Conners has been a trooper since 1991. Her annual salary is $116,000, according to state records.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, or via Twitter .

Categories: Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.