ShareThis Page
Traffic flow at proposed new Latrobe Elementary School questioned |

Traffic flow at proposed new Latrobe Elementary School questioned

Jeff Himler
| Thursday, January 5, 2017 11:00 p.m
Steph Chambers | Tribune-Review
A school bus passes through the intersection of Cedar and Ligonier streets in Latrobe on Thursday, Jan. 5, 2017. Nearby residents and business owners have concerns about the traffic there where the new Latrobe Elementary School will be built.

Residents and business owners bordering Latrobe’s Cedar and Ligonier streets think traffic at the proposed new Latrobe Elementary School could lead to problems unless planners rethink how vehicles will access the site.

Large trucks are a particular concern for some who want the school district to conduct a study of the traffic and planned entrances to the school, which is slated to be built on Latrobe’s Old Athletic Field and cover a city block bounded by Cedar, Ligonier and Cherry streets and Lincoln Avenue.

Carol Greenawalt, who resides and operates a beauty salon on Cedar Street, wrote the district and city outlining concerns.

“The traffic flow here is tremendous already,” Greenawalt said of Cedar. “This is a main road from Lincoln Avenue to Ligonier Street. A lot of tractor-trailers travel this area.

“I’m not opposed to the school. I wish they would have rethought using Cedar so much. I think they need to do a traffic study to see how congested this gets. It’s going to be a major traffic jam, especially in the morning and afternoon.”

Attorney Richard Jim hosted a group of concerned residents last month at his Ligonier office.

“There’s more traffic there than I think the (project) engineers believe,” he said. “Everybody approaches the intersection very carefully.”

City Manager Wayne Jones said he believes the project architect already has looked at traffic issues and indicated it is up to the school district if it wants to perform a formal traffic study. The city isn’t requiring one, he said, indicating 11 buses would serve the 800-student school and should not add significantly to the traffic there.

District officials didn’t return calls seeking comment.

A site plan prepared by consultant Axis Architecture and posted on the district website indicates all school buses and cars would enter the campus from a point on Cedar close to Ligonier. Buses would exit onto Cherry, near Ligonier. Cars would exit onto Cedar, closer to Lincoln.

Unless the vehicle entrance is wide enough, buses would have to swing wide when turning into the campus and could clash with residents’ vehicles parked on Cedar, Greenawalt said.

According to Greenawalt’s letter, neighbors suggested allowing for a turning radius of at least 30 feet leading in and out of the school property.

They argued campus safety could be enhanced by including a sidewalk along Cedar and by allowing for extra-wide parking spaces to provide motorists a better view of children walking through the area. The city requires a minimum parking space width of 8 feet, but residents would like that amended to 10 feet.

The residents also recommended relocating entrances and parking to an area along less-traveled Cherry and possibly cutting across a walking trail to connect the street to Lincoln. The site plan calls for play areas along Cherry, but Greenawalt suggested those could be placed elsewhere.

The school board last month authorized soliciting construction bids for the estimated $30 million new school, which will replace Latrobe’s current building for grades K-6 at Ligonier and Minehan Avenue — a former high school last renovated in 1993. The new school is planned to open in fall 2018.

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-836-6622 or

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Jeff by email at or via Twitter .

Categories: Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.