ShareThis Page
Unity supervisors reject Adelphoi USA’s sewage plan for independent living home |

Unity supervisors reject Adelphoi USA’s sewage plan for independent living home

Unity supervisors denied a plan to handle sewage at an independent living home for up to 15 people proposed by Adelphoi USA.

The township zoning hearing board approved the use for the 10-bedroom, three-bathroom building at 431 Saxman Road, but supervisors Thursday unanimously denied a plan that would include a temporary 5,000-gallon tank for sewage.

Supervisor Mike O’Barto said that not only did he disagree with the plan, he wanted to recognize the concerns of residents in June.

“If I can give some people out on Saxman Road a voice, I’m going to give it to them,” he said.

The building’s system could not handle the capacity necessary to operate and the tank would need to be pumped every several days, said township Solicitor Gary Falatovich.

Public sewage is not accessible in that area of the township.

The plan for the holding tank was approved by the state Department of Environmental Protection and Emil Bove, the township’s sewage enforcement officer.

In the meantime, Adelphoi USA has a design waiting for approval that would include a small flow treatment facility estimated to cost between $30,000 and $50,000 as a permanent solution, but needed the holding tank agreement approved first, Falatovich said.

The temporary measure would have allowed the holding tank on-site for two years, he said.

“My understanding is that the DEP will not accept an application for the construction of a permanent facility unless this holding tank” is allowed on the property, Falatovich told supervisors.

The building would house male residents between the ages of 16 and 20 who are able to attend school and work, but they would be transported and monitored by two to three staff members at all times.

The facility is planned to replace an independent living home in downtown Greensburg, one of three operated by Adelphoi, which oversees 21 facilities across Pennsylvania.

Falatovich said any further action will be determined by Adelphoi and the property owner.

In other business, supervisors approved a preliminary 2015 budget with no tax increase.

The budget will be balanced at $5.9 million, including $684,440 from the state including liquid fuels funding and a portion of the Act 13 natural gas impact funding.

O’Barto said the state allotment increased by about $40,000 while the budget total is about $18,000 lower than last year.

The 2015 budget includes purchase of a new front-end loader for $180,000 and an 2015 International dump truck for about $170,000 to replace a 1991 vehicle, one of 16 trucks in the township’s fleet.

“We’re going to get rid of one of the last dinosaurs that we have,” O’Barto said.

A new senior citizen tax rebate was budgeted at $42,000 last year, but that number was decreased to $20,000 for 2015 to adjust for participation after the first year.

The rebate allows qualified low-income residents 65 and older to receive a break on property taxes.

“We’re hoping as Unity Township ages, more people will be able to participate in the refund process,” O’Barto said, adding he was unsure of the final number of residents who participated in 2014.

Stacey Federoff is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-6660 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.