Unity wants to continue stormwater plan discussions |

Unity wants to continue stormwater plan discussions

Unity supervisors hope to meet with officials in Latrobe, Derry Township and Youngstown to continue discussions regarding a state Department of Environmental Protection order regarding treatment of stormwater overflow.

Supervisors met with the Unity Township Municipal Authority board members Wednesday and discussed an administrative order issued by the DEP Oct. 2 because the entities could not agree on a stormwater management plan.

Latrobe Municipal Authority, the city of Latrobe and Derry Township Municipal Authority have voted to appeal the administrative order.

During an executive session, solicitor Gary Falatovich addressed about 10 residents gathered and said the boards discussed the possibility of repercussions if Unity Township and the Unity Municipal Authority try to comply with the order while the other entities do not and to determine their response to the order.

Supervisors at their October meeting requested Falatovich to reach out to the municipalities to discuss the administrative order.

Once the boards returned from executive session, they discussed the future of the plan.

Supervisor Mike O’Barto said he would like to continue to try to reach an agreement in order to curtail costs, which have totaled into hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal and engineering fees for all the entities involved.

“I’d just like to see this resolved so the meter stops running,” he said.

Unity Township Municipal Authority board member Tom Couch said a long-term solution for their shared system is necessary because each of the municipalities has been held to sewage tap-in allocations by the DEP.

“We’re trying to solve this issue once and for all, not just kicking the can down the road,” he said.

Stacey Federoff is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.