Vandergrift man appeals sentence for infant daughter’s death |

Vandergrift man appeals sentence for infant daughter’s death

A Vandergrift man serving a 40-year prison sentence for the murder of his infant daughter wants a state appeals court to overturn his conviction.

Defense attorney Tim Dawson on Friday filed the appeal with the state’s Superior Court, seeking to challenge a ruling issued earlier this month that affirmed the third-degree murder conviction of Matthew Milisits.

Milisits, 39, pleaded guilty in 2014 and was sentenced by Westmoreland County Common Pleas Court Judge Rita Hathaway to serve 20-to-40 years in prison. Police said Milisits violently shook his 2-month-old daughter during a three-hour visit with the child in November 2012. The baby died from injuries sustained in the assault.

Milisits has appealed his conviction and sentence three times. Hathaway earlier this month rejected Milisits latest appeal in which he claimed he received inaccurate advice from one of his former lawyers. Milisits said he was led to believe he would serve just 10 years in prison by pleading guilty to a reduced murder charge.

Hathaway found there was no merit to his appeal.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293 or [email protected]

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.