Archive

Westmoreland County, state AG to get funds from illegal lottery | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Westmoreland County, state AG to get funds from illegal lottery

Westmoreland County and the state attorney general’s office will reap the benefits of an illegal lottery operation that was dismantled last year.

Assistant District Attorney Leo Ciaramitaro said about $34,000 that was seized by police from Daniel Gerard Petrella, 62, of Hempfield will be split between the county’s general fund and the state attorney general.

Petrella pleaded guilty Tuesday to two misdemeanor counts of maintaining an illegal lottery.

He was sentenced by Judge Rita Hathaway to one year of probation with the possibility of supervision ending in six months.

Petrella admitted guilt during the proceedings, but he declined to comment. Attorney Kenneth Burkley told Hathaway that Petrella doesn’t have a record.

State police were alerted Nov. 22, 2013, to a possible illegal lottery operation in Petrella’s home, according to court documents.

Petrella outlined the operation in detail during a recorded telephone conversation with a confidential informant, Trooper Teko Angelicchio wrote in an affidavit.

Police served a search warrant on Petrella’s home on Dec. 18, 2013, and found “numerous” illegal lottery tickets, ticket stubs, owe sheets and $34,000, the affidavit said.

“There were illegal lottery ticket stubs in nearly every room of the residence,” Angelicchio wrote in the affidavit. “Hundreds of illegal lottery tickets and stubs were seized from the house.”

Any property seized that is not gambling related, including $24,000 in savings bonds, will be returned to Petrella, Ciaramitaro said.

Renatta Signorini is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.