Archive

ShareThis Page
Westmoreland County to spend $1 million to re-up electronic monitoring contract | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Westmoreland County to spend $1 million to re-up electronic monitoring contract

Tribune-Review
| Friday, September 28, 2018 4:24 p.m

Westmoreland County will spend more than $1 million over the next three years to rent new equipment to monitor criminal defendants on house arrest.

Commissioners this week approved an extension of an existing contract with Behavioral Intervention Inc., the Boulder, Colo., company that since 2015 has provided the county’s probation department with monitors that track the whereabouts of defendants and their sobriety levels.

The deal signed off by Commissioners Charles Anderson and Ted Kopas calls for the county to pay nearly $30,000 a month to lease the equipment. Commissioner Gina Cerilli voted against the contract extension, saying it was not the product of a competitive process to find a vendor.

“This is about the process. It was supposed to be out for proposals. The company raised their prices and adult probation (department) refused to go out and get other bids,” Cerilli said.

Kopas said probation department officials found no other proposals for reliable equipment and the cost increase for extending the current contract will be covered through raising monitoring fees assessed to criminal defendants. Westmoreland County judges are expected to increase those monthly fees from $10 to $12, he said.

“We need to have reliable equipment,” Kopas said.

Sharon Bold, the county’s chief probation officer, said her staff reviewed equipment from other providers and concluded that none were as reliable as the monitors pitched by the firm that currently services the county.

The county currently has about 230 defendants serving time on house arrest.

“There were a lot of things we looked at and a couple of companies came in and did demonstrations. They weren’t reliable and we’ve been with (Behavioral Intervention) for a long time and they’ve been reliable for us. The judges want it to be as reliable as possible,” Bold said.

Cerill said she wanted to see if there were cheaper options worth considering for the equipment.

“I just want them to sharpen their pencils and to go through the process,” Cerilli said.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293 or rcholodofsky@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.