Archive

ShareThis Page
Westmoreland County will pay $85K to settle racial discrimination lawsuit against sheriff | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Westmoreland County will pay $85K to settle racial discrimination lawsuit against sheriff

Tribune-Review
| Thursday, September 27, 2018 5:03 p.m.
279929gtrsheriffnew022718
Sean Stipp | Tribune-Review
Westmoreland County Sheriff Jonathan Held arrives at the Greensburg office of District Judge Chris Flanigan on Feb. 26, 2018. Held is accused of ordering his staff to campaign for him while on duty.

Westmoreland County commissioners on Thursday approved an $85,000 settlement in a racial discrimination lawsuit filed against Sheriff Jonathan Held and his department.

In the federal lawsuit filed in March, Gideon C. McClain, 61, of Jeannette, contended he was unlawfully rejected for a job in the sheriff’s office because he is black.

“It was a business decision. We had to settle,” said Commissioner Gina Cerilli.

The lawsuit is one of four filed against Held and the sheriff’s department this year. McClain’s case and another filed by a rejected job applicant alleged they were victims of racial discrimination. Two other federal discrimination lawsuits were filed by current deputies who claimed they were rejected for promotions because they were reservists in the U.S. military.

Commissioners said terms of the out-of-court settlement in McClain’s lawsuit barred them from discussing details of the case. Held previously denied any wrongdoing and in March issued a statement in which he said his department did not discriminate.

“As a condition of the settlement, I am not permitted to comment on it,” Held said Thursday.

Held, a two-term Republican sheriff, was first elected in 2012. Since taking office, his department has been been named as defendants in 11 lawsuits, many involving current and former department staffers. With Thursday’s action, seven of those lawsuits have been settled, with the county agreeing to pay out more than $188,000 to resolve the cases. A Tribune-Review analysis this year found that through March, the county also paid nearly $150,000 in legal fees involving the lawsuits against the sheriff’s department.

“It’s distasteful that the sheriff’s actions keep costing taxpayers dearly,” said Commissioner Ted Kopas.

Held, 44, of Hempfield, this year was charged by the state Attorney General’s Office with three public corruption-related criminal counts. He was accused of directing sheriff’s department staffers to perform campaign chores while on duty. Held’s trial is scheduled to begin in December.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293 or rcholodofsky@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.